Addi wrote:
sad bitnim stvarima da se okrenem. united je prije koji dan pobjedio chelsea na bridge-u prvi put nakon 10 godina.
da je bilo pravde,u najmanju ruku bilo bi nezivjesno do kraja.
ovako,sudija je odlučio dati junajtedu pobjedu u vidu crvenog kartona i gola iz ofsajda.
to je istina.
Addi wrote:
hhahaha pa sad gledas sta je polozio lik sta nije
a tih silnih blogova pisci sto se navodilo naveliko, jel oni imaju vise od bejzik osnove o sudjenju
kako god, vise je i od mene i od tebe, i liku je to hljeb. a ako trazis iskustvo jel moze vise od alexa? a eto i za njega govoris da je ovo i ono.
prvo,vrlo je neozbiljno od jedne novine kao sto je telegraf da izbacuje ovakve neosnovane tekstove.
drugo,odakle ti to da taj lik zna više od mene i od tebe..
jel ga poznaješ lično ili šta?
što se mene tiče,ovaj lik je smijurija i definitvno ga nikada ne bih citirao.
a izgleda da je tako i sudeći po komentarima ispod teksta:
Quote:
James Derbyshire
05/12/2012 03:47 PM
Extremely poor research. For example you state Bolton 2-2 QPR because of the Clint Hill 'goal'.
The corner for the Clint Hill 'goal' was not a corner but a goal-kick. The goal that QPR did score was offside. So if we were ruling out 'incorrect decisions' the score would not be 2-2, it would be 2-0 to Bolton.
Given how incorrect that one instance is, I can only assume the rest of the results are fraught with inaccuracies.
If you're going to do something as time consuming (and frankly, as pointless) as this, then you might as well go the whole hogg and go through each decision rather than pick and choose 'incorrect' decisions.
Quote:
kurtwallander
05/12/2012 09:41 AM
Looks to me like Tim Long is either :
(a) fourteen years old, or
(b) treating us all to the results of his latest ref's qualification assignment, or
(c) both
Does he really believe that anyone with an ounce of intelligence will be taken in by his dubious methodology and blatantly pro Man Utd analysis?
itd.
_LOKI_ wrote:
Saletu da Steven Gerrard napise ne bi bilo dobro, tako da I'm out...
upravo.
ako nešto nije istina,nikada ne bi stajao iza toga pa makar i stiven džerard kaže takvo nešto.
Quote:
"There was only one team who came into the derby trying to play football," said Gerrard. "Everton are effective because they have some big physical lads in the team and are very direct. They are effective. But the only team who tried to play football was us.
"Everton are not better than us. I thought we stood up to a team that are very similar to Stoke. Every single time they got the ball to their goalkeeper it came in long. We had a young, small team and they were all men and stood together. We deserved the win."
Quote:
The match statistics do not support Gerrard's assessment. Everton enjoyed more possession than Liverpool (56.2% to 43.8%), made more passes (400 to 314), had greater passing accuracy (78.5% to 76.8%) and played proportionally fewer long passes (13.8% to 14.6%)
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
ma na kraju krajeva da se tako lako i ocigledno sudi vazda u korist uniteda, ne bi sigurno izgubili titulu od city-a na go razlici. i city-u se vecinom u korist sudi, al to ne bi nazvao namjestanjem nego blagim siljenjem ka boljim ekipama. to je vazda bilo i bice. al po meni to uopste nije bitan faktor.
) odma na po terena i završit priču..na terenu.
